TLDR: Epic Games is involved in a law suit with Apple. Apple submits a subpoena to get sales data from Valve (the owner of Steam) about 436 games. How is this legal?
As more time passes, it becomes clear that the legal system
in the US is a total joke. This is a country in which you can sign a contract
for practically anything. If a company kills you because of a direct action
that puts your life in danger (like what kept happening with America’s Top
Model) and you signed a contract in which it says that company is not
responsible for any harm that happens to you, it is impossible to sue. I
mentioned America’s Top Model because all participants signed such a contract.
As a result, the network behind the show did horrible things to the models and
could have actually killed them several times. If that happened, nothing could
have been done from a legal point of view.
Getting back to the subject, Epic Games is in a legal battle
with Apple. It claims that Apple locks the developers into the App Store
ecosystem, forcing them to pay taxes for in-app purchases of 30%.
Apple’s response was that others do the same thing and
actually drafted a subpoena to get data from Valve, the company that owns Steam.
Apple tries to prove that it is the same as the competition.
And a judge, Thomas S. Hixson, actually ordered Valve to
respect the subpoena and to deliver the data Apple requested.
So, in a battle between two companies, the judge decided
that it is completely legal to involve another company.
Yeah. This is legal. And it can actually lead to fines for
Valve because there is a high possibility the company would not be able to
gather all the data requested until the deadline, which is mid-March. Jay P.
Srinivasan, Apple’s lawyer, actually said that Apple was entitled to request
data for all the 30,000 games available in the Steam store. Isn’t Apple kind
that it only asked for 436 games?
Here’s the deal.
I do not care about what will happen during the July court
hearing between Epic Games and Apple. This subpoena actually gives Apple very
important sensitive data that belongs to another company. And it involves all
the game developers of those 436 games. And Apple wanted data starting from
2015. The judge only allowed the gathering of data from 2017.
Regardless of what happens in the July trial, Apple just
gained access to incredibly important data for them that can drastically
influence business decisions in the future.
This should not be legal.
But it is.
To put things into perspective, let’s put this situation
into an easier scenario to understand. Let’s say you sell socks. There are two
more stores in your neighborhood that also sell socks. The two owners start to
argue and one of them accuses the other that they lock companies that make
socks into working with them and charge 30% fees on each sale. The store that
is accused responds by creating a subpoena in which it asks you to provide all
sales data for all the socks you sold since 2015.
Once again, how is this legal?
Yeah, the socks example is stupid and it has some clear
flaws. But, the same thing applies.
I am incredibly surprised to see people saying that the
decision is right and there is no problem with it. I do not care if the law is
on Apple’s side. There is no ethical justification in this case to request data
from a business when you are in a law suit with another one.
No comments:
Post a Comment